Search Results

c21aafd4-fa4e-48e5-85b7-6fda5c6ab3a5 POST DOCTORAL PROJECT: The career aspirations of nurses working in the research delivery workforce: a cross-sectional survey Chief Investigator: Dr Miriam Avery – University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Organisations Involved: University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust. Background: We know that nurse-led research in health and social care is crucial to enable nurses to deliver high quality care based on the best available evidence. Nurse-led research is being generated within higher education institutions and a small number of NHS roles, but nurses remain an under-represented group in health services research. There is a clear capacity problem for nurse-led research. Within the NHS, the largest group of nurses working in research are in research delivery roles. This section of the nursing workforce has experience, skills, and competencies in delivering research within a health and social care environment from start to finish. All these skills are of prime importance when designing and leading a research study. However, as there is little published data on the career aspirations of this group of nurses, the extent to which they have the desire to progress an independent researcher career and build capacity for nurse- led research is unknown. The aim of the study is to undertake an online survey of nurses working in research delivery roles in local acute NHS Trusts to determine the career aspirations of this group of nurses. The study is at a very early stage, with the research proposal and protocol in the process of being developed. We expect the set-up and recruitment phase to be completed by the autumn of 2022. The planned online survey includes questions around the current activities of nurses in research delivery roles, as well as training, skills, competencies, and career aspirations. The findings from the survey will provide much needed data about the aspirations of this group of nurses, which will determine the next phase of this research project. If there is aspiration for independent research amongst a section of this workforce, then there is an urgent need to facilitate progression along this career path. Summary of Findings We found that…. • Respondents: 298 Nurses, midwives and AHP’s in the research delivery workforce completed the survey (43% response rate) about ‘research leader’ career aspirations. •Nearly a quarter ‘aspired’ to be a research leader; around a half ‘might aspire’. •Of those aspiring, most (70%) found it difficult or very difficult. Only around a third were confident of achieving ‘research leader’ within 5 years. • Publications: only 21% had been a named author on a peer-reviewed publication • Funding: Most (81%) had no idea or were uncertain as to where to apply for funding •The factors that most respondents identified would help them achieve this goal were: clearer career paths into research leader roles , more guidance and support in making career choices and more mentorship opportunities . • Conclusion: there appears to be a large number expressing some potential aspiration for leading research within the nurse/midwife/AHP research delivery workforce – is this untapped potential? What did we do with this knowledge? - The knowledge from this study has relevance to academics and the clinical research delivery workforce. - Local communication: Presentation of the findings at University Hospital Southampton Research & Development Quarterly Forum meeting. The audience was mainly Research Delivery staff and management. - International conference: Abstract and poster at the RCN International Research Conference in Manchester (6th-8th September 2023). - Direct NIHR presentation: The findings of the survey were presented to Professor Ruth Endacott (NIHR Director of Nursing & Midwifery). What is next? We are planning 2 publications and an update to NIHR.

7a002421-31aa-4897-bd4d-da37a8b4cf6a Avoiding care escalations through targeted care coordination for people with multiple long-term conditions – a knowledge mobilisation project Chief Investigator: Simon Fraser, Professor of Public Health, University of Southampton Team: Nisreen Alwan, Professor of Public Health, University of Southampton, Lead for the Healthy Communities theme (from 1st Oct 2024), NIHR ARC Wessex. Robin Poole, Consultant in Public Health, Southampton City Council. Michael Boniface, Professorial Fellow of Information Technology, Director of the IT Innovation Centre, University of Southampton, and lead for the Workforce and Health Systems theme, NIHR ARC Wessex. Kelly Cheung, PPI lead, NIHR ARC Wessex and University Hospitals Southampton. Emilia Holland, Public Health Registrar, University of Southampton. Seb Stannard, Research Fellow, MELD-B project, University of Southampton. Claire Sheikh, Senior Pharmacist, Living Well Partnership, Southampton. Kelly Hislop Lennie, Principal Academic in Adult Nursing, Bournemouth University. Lynn Laidlaw, Patient and public contributor and researcher, PPI contributor MELD-B Sally Dace, PPI contributor MELD-B and Wessex ARC James McMahon, PPI contributor MELD-B, School of Primary Care Research UoS, South West Genomic Medicine Service. Lead PPIE for DIALOR, a digital intervention addressing frailty in Bournemouth University Partners: Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth University, Southampton City Council, Living Well Partnership. Start: 1 October 2024 End: 31 March 2026 Summary This project is about taking knowledge that has been learned from two ongoing research studies about living with multiple long-term health conditions to see if we can apply it in a ‘real life’ setting in a large general practice in Southampton. Two research projects called ‘MELD-B’ and ‘the ARC Treatment Burden study’ have identified many aspects that make living with multiple long-term conditions challenging for people. This ‘workload’ might make it more likely that people feel overwhelmed by their health conditions. If people have a high workload, and particularly if they are frail, this can end up with them needing to be admitted to hospital. We have also identified that some aspects of people’s early life can make it more likely that they are admitted to hospital in middle age. If such challenges are recognised in advance and appropriate help provided, such unplanned admissions might be avoided. Care coordinators are people working in NHS settings, including GP surgeries, to identify and support people at risk of such admissions. They have a lot of people on their books and it can be challenging to know who needs what help, and who needs it most urgently. We want to see if the things we have learned from our previous research study can help the care coordinator make these decisions. In this short project we plan to do this in a large practice in Southampton, the Living Well Partnership, which looks after about 45,000 people. We plan to: · collate all the aspects identified in these studies that might make people more vulnerable · make sure we understand the current way care coordinators identify and engage with patients · work with all the relevant people in the practice to make sure we take people on this journey with us · undertake some workshops, co-led by PPI contributors, to co-develop the strategy for adding new aspects (such as the ‘workload’ and early life aspects mentioned above) to current approaches · test the addition of adding these in Living Well Partnership and evaluate the process We will share our findings at an event involving as many of the team from the Living Well Partnership as we can and get their feedback. This event will also include other relevant interested parties, such as those from the Integrated Care Board. PPI contributors have been deeply involved in the work of MELD-B, have helped to shape this proposal and will continue as co-investigators. They will be reimbursed for their contributions according to NIHR guidance. Read the public policy briefing

b369496b-453f-489e-9d44-7a954ac3f6d7 Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways (STIMULATE) This project is part of a national consortium Contact: Professor Nisreen Alwan MBE , University of Southampton There is evidence that access to Long Covid (Post Covid-19 Syndrome) NHS Care and related care pathways, the nature of those pathways, and patient experience, varies. Research is required to inform diagnosis, care, public health strategies, policy planning, resource allocation and budgeting. It is likewise essential to define the usual care pathway in Post Covid services, and to understand patient presentation, and the effectiveness and cost of care. The STIMULATE-ICP consortium includes: University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, University College London, University of Central Lancashire, LongCovidSOS, UK Doctors #Longcovid , Royal College of General Practitioners, University of Liverpool, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Perspectum, Living With, University of Hull, Hull University Teaching Hospitals Trust, University of York, University of Leicester, University of Exeter, University of Southampton, University of Sussex, Alliance Medical, GE Healthcare, Olink, Francis Crick Institute, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, Office of National Statistics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, as well as NIHR Clinical Research Network support. Plain English Summary of the health inequalities work within STIMUALTE-ICP: 23 interviews were completed with people with probable Long Covid We found… There was a lack of awareness of Long Covid, its symptoms and the support available for people with Long Covid An assumed lack of awareness of Long Covid within healthcare People with Long Covid symptoms experienced doubt and uncertainty about the cause of their symptoms Experiences of stigma and discrimination were commonly experienced by people with probable Long Covid. This included experiences of age and gender discrimination, experiences of being dismissed, unsympathetic attitudes and social exclusion. People with probable Long Covid reported feeling embarrassment, feeling tainted and/or different to others because of their Long Covid symptoms. In addition, they expected disbelief and/or judgement from others because of Long Covid People with Long Covid were sometimes reluctant to seek care due to worries surrounding possible investigations and medications, or worries about symptoms being wholly attributed to mental health conditions. There were also concerns about burdening the NHS. The nature of Long Covid symptoms made accessing care difficult. Long Covid symptoms can often come and go or fluctuate, and sometimes one symptom may be more prominent than others. This can mean some symptoms can be overlooked by patients and healthcare professionals. Experiences of people with Long Covid are also constitute epistemic injustice, or inequality surrounding creating, interpreting and conveying knowledge. This is due to the lack of awareness and knowledge of Long Covid both in the community and within healthcare. The findings are published here https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hex.14037 Our recommendations: What we did Research findings from this study and the NIHR funded HICOVE study have been translated into an easily-usable webtool. This tool aims to encourage people with probable Long Covid who have not yet sought help and support from the NHS or other services to do so. It covers topics of self-doubt, stigma and effects on mental health as well as offering resources, tips, and advice on next steps. This tool is primarily aimed at people who may have Long Covid but are not currently accessing care but may also be helpful to those who are. It is also aimed at healthcare professionals, social prescribers, as well as community organisations to raise awareness about the difficulties and stigma people, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, may face when considering reaching out for a consultation or community support. The webtool is available here: Supporting Long Covid Care ( long-covid-care.org.uk ) Where next? We are working on disseminating the Supporting Long Covid Care webtool as widely as possible and evaluating so that we improve it further. See our news article

7fc9e212-9328-4765-add4-7315e187c43b Workforce Evaluation Toolkit project (WET) Outline: This is a commissioned piece of work from the ARC Wessex Workforce & Health Systems (WHS) theme to support them with regular requests from healthcare providers. The project is to iteratively develop a generic toolkit for the evaluation of new workforce roles across healthcare. The aim during the current project is to build a first trial version to prove the toolkit concept and generate buy-in from system partners. The Bakker’s Workforce engagement model Burnout forms the conceptual basis for evaluation toolkit. The deliverable for this project is a minimal viable product, in the shape of a workforce evaluation toolkit. Team: Ruth Barker Programme Manager – Insight Health Innovation Wessex . Cheryl Davies, Senior Programme Manager Innovation Adoption, Health Innovation Wessex. Rachel Bailey Senior Programme Manager - Insight, Health Innovation Wessex. Ends: 30 June 2024 More detailed outline or project and partners Workforce Evaluation Project Work Packages 011223[99] .docx Download DOCX • 390KB

91dc7d16-9cb6-45e1-b40a-33037865948b Digital support for maintaining physical activity in people with long-term conditions What promotes and prevents health professionals using ‘digital’ technologies to support people with long-term conditions (LTCs) to maintain physical activity and improve their health and wellbeing? Principle Investigator - Professor Mary Barker ( meb@mrc.soton.ac.uk ) Senior Research Assistant – Dr James Gavin ( j.p.gavin@soton.ac.uk ) Team Prof Mary Barker (PI), Prof Maria Stokes (Co-Lead), Prof Suzanne McDonough (Co-Lead at RCSI), Mrs Luisa Holt, Dr Aoife Stephenson (RCSI), Mr Paul Muckelt, Dr Nisreen Alwan, Dr Katherine Bradbury, Dr James Faulkner (University of Winchester), Dr Dorit Kunkel, Dr Euan Sadler, Prof Sandy Jack, Mrs Rachael Eckford, Mr Jem Lawson (PPI) and Mr Ranj Parmar (PPI) Project partners • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland • University of Winchester What did we find? We interviewed 15 GPs and health professionals to find out their experiences of using digital technologies, such as online consultations, mobile-phone applications (or ‘apps’) and websites, to support people with LTCs to manage their health. We now have a better understanding of the factors preventing and promoting the use of digital technologies by health professionals to support people with LTCs in the NHS. These included: Preventing : one ‘app’ will not suit all LTCs, ‘apps’ must be user-friendly and accurate, clinicians need to dedicate time to the technology, security risks, patients need to have digital literacy, and long-term investment is required (time and finance). Promoting : ‘apps’ being evidence based, peer/social support of GP networks (including positive feedback), charity endorsement, COVID-19 changing people’s attitudes to digital health, ‘apps’ being linked to a hospital’s IT systems, accountability/monitoring of ‘apps’, and digital champions What difference will this make? Better understanding of the factors preventing and promoting the use of digital technologies by NHS healthcare professionals can help researchers develop new assessments and interventions to help people with LTCs to self-manage their conditions. In future, it could inform a regional evaluation of existing self-management programmes and initiatives to support people with LTCs to maintain their health and physical activity, from a digital perspective What are we doing with this? We have published one journal paper in PLOS One ( 2024 ) and co-investigator, Prof O’Donough published one systematic review paper in Digital Health ( 2024 ) In conjunction with the ‘non-digital’ MOTH study, we are in the process of applying for funding for: A PhD studentship, and NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) award Maintaining physical activity and social connections for people with multiple LTCs: intervention development. The aim is to produce a plan for how best to proceed with improving partnership working within Wessex. The aim is to produce a plan for how best to proceed with improving partnership working within Wessex. What next? We plan to combine the non-digital and digital findings from the MOTH programme and apply for NIHR RfPB funding to co-design a 12-week follow-on maintenance intervention to sustainphysical activity for people with multiple LTCs following existing PA programmes between healthcare and community settings. The intervention will be developed informed by and aligned to the NHS Neighborhood Health agenda (2025) and current Southampton Integrated Neighborhood Hubs project . A suitable funding call is the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme (tier 3), with a stage 1 deadline of February 2026. Digital MOTH summary Non-Digital Moth Summary Publications https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221089778

45c5bd14-475f-4afa-ac9a-403f77123c69 CHAMPION: Children whose mothers are involved in the criminal justice system in Dorset & Hampshire: developing health and social care outcome indicators Chief Investigator Professor Julie Parkes Professor in Public Health Head of School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton, South Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Dr Emma Plugge Associate Professor in Public Health School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton, Co-Investigators Dr Donna Arrondelle , Research Fellow, University of Southampton Dr Naomi Gadian, Public Health Specialist Registrar, University of Southampton Donna Gipson, Director EP:IC Consultants Ltd, West Malling, Kent Dr James Hall , Associate Professor of Educational Psychology, University of Southampton Paula Harriott , Head of Prison Engagement, Prison Reform Trust Professor Kathleen Kendall , Professorial Fellow of Sociology as Applied to Medicine, University of Southampton Dr Sara Morgan , Associate Professor in Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton Professor James Raftery , Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Dr Lucy Wainwright , Director of Research, EP:IC Consultants Ltd, West Malling, Kent Starts: 1st April 2023 Ends: 30th September 2024 Summary In this study, we will identify important features of children’s health and wellbeing that are affected when their mother is sent to prison. For example, it might be their mental wellbeing or their behaviour. If we know what the important features are, then researchers and organisations providing services (such as the NHS) can monitor these for change; this is important to see how the child is but also to see if services are helping him or her. In the past, researchers have not looked in depth at the health and wellbeing of these children. We want to look at all the studies conducted so far to see what areas of their health have been looked at and also to find out areas of their health where the evidence is lacking. We will also speak with adults who were children when their mother was imprisoned to hear their views about what health issues are important and what would have helped them at that time. We will also speak to children who are living with their mother in a prison alternative in the community to find out from them about their health and what has helped them in this particular place. Finally, we will speak with a range of professionals, from doctors to teachers, who work with children whose mother has been imprisoned. We will ask them to tell us about the aspects of these children’s health and wellbeing that they think are important and likely to be affected by the child’s mother going to prison. When we have the information from published studies, from the children themselves and from the professionals, we will bring together a group of people with experience of their mother being imprisoned and also professionals. We will work with them to agree the most important features of children’s health and wellbeing that are affected when their mother is sent to prison. These ‘outcome measures’ are helpful to developing services for these children. People with experience of their mother being imprisoned have helped design the project. They will also be important in spreading the word about the study. This will enable us to reach not just academic audiences and policy makers through publishing in journals or presenting at research conferences, but also people with lived experience and charities that work in this area. Informing a wide range of people will be important in ensuring that the findings from this study are acted on.

0f5a7259-3857-4aa4-8b2c-0c628421e76a Interventions to support physical activity for adults (MOTH) Maintenance Of physical aTivity beHaviour (MOTH) programme Also see Digital support for maintaining physical activity in people with long-term conditions and Non-digital support for maintaining physical activity in people with long-term conditions – within Maintenance Of physical acTivity beHaviour (MOTH) programme Principal Investigator: Professor Mary Barker Deputy Lead: Professor Mary Barker ( Professor of Psychology and Behavioural Science) Professor Maria Stokes (Professor of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK Head of Active Living Research Group) Team members: Dr James Gavin, Luisa Holt, Professor Jo Adams , Dr David Culliford , Professor Suzanne McDonough (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; Visiting Prof at UoS), Dr Aoife Stephenson (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland), Dr James Faulkner (University of Winchester), Mr Ranj Parmar , Mr Jem Lawson (Public contributors), Dr Euan Sadler , Dr Dorit Kunkel , Dr Simon Fraser , Professor Sandy Jack , Professor James Bilzon (University of Bath), Dr Simon Jones (University of Bath), Dr Enhad Chowdhury (University of Bath), Mr Jem Lawson and Mr Ranj Parmer (public contributors) Start: October 2019 Ends: 31 December 2023 Project Partners: Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Winchester, Bournemouth University, University of Portsmouth, Wessex Clinical Research Network, University of Bath, NHS, AHSN Lay summary Physical activity is an important part of managing and preventing long-term conditions (LTC), through supporting people to remain active, improve symptoms and reduce future problems. A variety of digital and non-digital programmes and tools exist, such as exercise referral schemes and websites or mobile applications, to support people to start being active. However, these programmes/tools are often less effective at helping people to stay active in the longer term. The MOTH programme aims to identify existing digital tools and their components that help people with LTCs to stay active and understand the factors that support or inhibit their use in the NHS. The programme is also working with exercise referral schemes to evaluate and understand the needs of participants to support physical activity after the scheme has ended. Ultimately, the MOTH programme aims to develop digital and non-digital support that is usable, accessible and relevant to help people with LTCs to stay active. In doing so, the programme is aligned to many of the NHS long-term plan priorities, such as ‘responding to population needs’, ‘supporting people to age well’ and ‘increasing equitable provision of resources’

Koren Luddington - Social Worker Autism and Neurodivergence Team - Portsmouth City Council < Back How I found my way S A L T to social worker Koren Luddington - Social Worker Autism and Neurodivergence Team - Portsmouth City Council Becoming a Social Worker was a slightly unexpected career path for me. After qualifying with a degree in Speech and Language Therapy at university, I fully intended on having a life-long career as a Speech and Language Therapist. During my training, I took a real interest in Learning Disability and Autism and got my initial post-qualification experience in this area. Being young and responsibility free, after a couple of years of working, I spontaneously decided to leave the country and explore the world for a year. Unfortunately, in this time the UK went into recession and when I returned home, there were limited opportunities arising in the NHS. Koren Luddington is a Social worker in Portsmouth At this point, the novel pilot scheme 'Step Up to Social Work' was brought to my attention. At first, I was only paying the idea lip service, as Social Work didn't really appeal to me - albeit, I knew very little about it. However, my skills and qualifications did tally with the requirements of this employment-based route into Social Work, which would also secure me a Masters degree upon completion. As I progressed through the stages of the application process, I began to find the subject varied and interesting. Through the 18 months of on-the-job training and studying, I felt more and more passionately about Social Work ideology and that this was in fact the most suitable career choice for me. I worked for 10 years in Children's Services, giving me an excellent foundation to build and hone my Social Work skills. When I saw a job advertised specialising in autism, I felt like this would be a great opportunity to return to this area of interest as well as improving my knowledge and experience of working in Adult Services. Since my initial experience of working in this area, there has been enormous progression in the understanding and approach towards Autism as a cognitive variance within the wider context of neurodivergence. I have enjoyed refreshing and updating my understanding of this shift in thinking and find it fascinating that there continues to be a tussle between whether autism should be considered via a social model or medical model framework. Listening to the lived experiences of the neuro-divergent people that I am working with, really got me thinking about many facets and themes that recurringly have impacted on these young people's lives. For example, is a diagnosis beneficial? If so, why is it needed and what support is inaccessible for those without a diagnosis? For what reason are autistic people 6 times more likely to experience mental health crisis than the general population?How well do universal services understand and accommodate the neuro-divergent needs of individuals? I found these kinds of questions sparking my curiosity and I was keen to explore whether there may be some responses to these questions. So, when the opportunity was presented to link with Portsmouth University as a visiting researcher, I was interested to find out more. Never having associated myself with 'academia', I was unsure whether my skills and knowledge would meet the necessary requirements for the role. It seemed like a completely different world from my day-to-day working experience; a world that I had perceived as being elusive and exclusive. My concerns were alleviated as I was matched with a mentor from the University, who was empathic and reassuring of my self-doubts. She made me feel as though all questions were valid and she was able to provide explanations that felt personalised and relevant to my field of work. Practically, my mentor has helped me to get set up on the University computer system, showed me how to access the library journals, search facilities and introduced me to new referencing software (which was not a 'thing' when I was last studying!) Crucially, my mentor has helped me to structure and narrow down my thought processes to identify a focus and objective for my research ideas. She has encouraged me to begin to critically analyse relevant topics and to identify and categorise themes in research. Undertaking training in realist evaluation has taught me the theoretical and structural basis that I needed to be able to consider the functionality of neurodivergent support services, within the importance of contextual systems and environments. It's inspiring to feel that researching the intricacies of service implementation can help provide much needed information; going some way to begin answering those initial stirring questions. My aim is to continue refining my ideas and learning from the wealth of research available in this area. If this could lead to working on a research project that would demonstrate an evidence base for useful and valuable support services for the neurodivergent community, then this would be hugely worthwhile progress towards improved opportunities and outcomes for autistic and neurodivergent people. Previous Next

6bbcedc2-84c3-4fab-84e5-93672150e077 ADOPTED: Social Prescribers In Deprescribing Role (SPiDeR) Team: Dr Kinda Ibrahim, Pharmacist and Lecturer, Faculty of Medicine, Deputy Lead Ageing and Dementia, ARC Wessex Dr Sara McKelvie, NIHR Clinical Lecturer in General Practice Dr Eloise Radcliff, Research Fellow, Faculty of Medicine Emma Ward, 3rd Year Medical Student Lizzie Wimbourne, PhD candidate and Policy Intern (supported by Gareth Giles) Dr Laura Bryant, GP and School of Primary Care Apprentice Pam Douglas and Neil Wilson, Public Contributors and Co-applicants Senior Support Prof Hazel Everitt, Dr Stephanie Tierney, Prof Peter Griffiths and Prof Joanne Reeve Starts: April 2023 Ends: September 30, 2024 In the UK, a third of all people aged 65 years and above regularly take five or more medications, known as polypharmacy. Polypharmacy can increase the risks of side effects and hospital admissions. One of national priorities for NHS England set by the Chief Pharmacist, is to reduce prescribing unnecessary medication (overprescribing) by 10% for patients being treated by their GPs. One important way to identify and stop harmful medication is called a Structured Medication Review (SMR) but only half of older patients attended their GP practice for this in 2018-19. Instead of medicines, some people might benefit from other activities such as changes in diet, ways to reduce stress, increasing exercise or participating in group activities. Social prescribers are starting to work within GP teams to direct people to some of these activities. The Chief Pharmacists report on overprescribing suggested that NHS England should expand the use of SMRs in GP practices to benefit patients most at risk of overprescribing. They also recommended the involvement of trained social prescribing link workers as part of GP teams to support patients during and after a SMR. We currently don’t know how social prescribers can be integrated in the SMR process or whether this will have an impact on overprescribing for older people. The aim of this study is to explore the role of social prescribers in the SMR process and identify any training needs or resources required to enable their active involvement in the process. We will hold focus groups with healthcare professionals (GPs, pharmacists and social prescribing link workers) and interview older people who have experience of taking several medicines and/or their caregivers to: 1- Understand whether there is a role for social prescribers in SMR in Primary Care teams 2- Identify training needs for social prescribers to be actively involved in Primary Care teams who are doing SMR reviews 3- Identify factors that might prevent or improve social prescribers’ involvement in SMR 4- Consider what older people and healthcare professionals felt about alternatives to medications and map relevant activities and guidance that could be used as a substitute to medications such as dietary advice, exercise groups or cognitive behaviour therapy 5- Develop a model to describe how social prescribers can be best involved in SMR Understanding the role of social prescribing link workers in the SMR process might increase the use of non-medical solutions for health-related problems and reduce overprescribing. This study could help develop the role of social prescribers and understanding how they could work in primary care to support SMR. We hope this research will help us design and test different models of how social prescribers can work within GP teams to support deprescribing. This project is linked to STOP-DEM and MODIFY SPiDeR project for ARC Wessex 18.9.23 .pptx Download PPTX • 6.89MB

60f9f2f4-ec86-4835-abb5-cb3e74214a4f Domestic Abuse and Life-Limiting Illness: identifying and supporting adults at risk (DALLI Study) ! Widget Didn’t Load Check your internet and refresh this page. If that doesn’t work, contact us.

ARC Wessex is part of the National Institute for Health and Care Research. We conduct research together with universities, health and care services, the NHS, charities, people and patients to improve the lives of people in our community. ARC Wessex 2019-2016 Two ARC leaders appointed Senior Investigators Helping older people get the right medicine Future researchers mark milestone Celebrating the impact of Dementia Fellowships - DEM-COMM Moving Beyond 12 Hour Shifts: How Evidence is Powering Change Have you forgotten me - bridging the gap with dementia diagnosis Read more NIHR ARC Wessex in numbers 200+ Members 100+ Academy members £18M Invested in research 155 Research projects

How we involve and engage patients and the public in our applied health and care research Patient and Public Involvement, Engagement and Participation (or PPIEP in short) Our vision has been Meaningful public and community involvement and engagement has been a central part of NIHR ARC Wessex’ health and social care research activities. Over the last six and a half years patients and the public have supported our research in many ways. Helping to design research, co-producing research projects and their outputs, being an esstential part of the whole research process from inception to completion. In addition to their contributions during and after the research process, our public contributors have helped act as ambassadors for our work and helped to promote its findings. Below are just some of the images over the years of our contributors. How we met the UK standards for Public and Patient Involvement and Engage Downloadable information Impact report Glossary