Search Results

Workforce & Health Systems Theme lead Professor Michael Boniface Theme lead Deputy theme leads Dr Dan Burns Health Systems Dr Chiara Dall'ora Workforce Workforce & Health Systems Theme We know that the health workforce are an asset and in short supply. As part of our ARC research we are planning a series of studies. We will look at the best ways for staff to work - for example where and when. We also want to improve conditions - in part by ensuring they have time to do the jobs we are asking them to do. Cultivating a flow of pioneering ideas that offer the potential to transform people's lives and the economy using information technology is a motivating force that drives us. Our capacity to rapidly turn these ideas into benefits for partners through collaborative, applied research and innovation makes Southampton a truly exciting place to be. Research projects ADOPTED ActMed-VW - Healthcare professional's experiences of Access to Medication for people on Virtual Wards who are in their last year of life Read more ADOPTED PROJECT - PREMAC 2 STUDY Development and application of Patient Report Experience Measure for patients accessing ACute oncology services: Read more Implementation and Evaluation of the Advanced Practice Research Toolkit Read more Adopted Project: Paramedic delivery of end-of-life care: a mixed methods evaluation of service provision and professional practice (PARAID) Read more PROCED-DST: PROactive, Collaborative and Efficient complex Discharge – Decision Support Tool Read more FORTH – FORecasting Turbulence in Hospitals Read more Predicting nurse staffing requirements -validation and scoping extension study (PREDICT-NURSE validation and extension) Read more Identifying the knowledge gaps of paramedics managing patients with mental health issues Read more Wessex SNSDE Study (SETT Centre) Read more ADOPTED (PhD): PREPARE-to-ACT study: Preparing for and Responding to Emergencies – A multi-phased qualitative investigation of Patients’ And members of their RElational networks’ decisions to use urgent and emergency care during Anti-Cancer Treatment Read more PUNDIT – Predicting hospital Usage Numbers via a DIgital Twin Read more ADOPTED: A Study to Evaluate the Introduction of new Staffing Models in Intensive Care: a Realist evaluation (SEISMIC-R) Read more COMPLETED: PREDICT-NURSE – feasibility: Predicting Patient Acuity/Dependency-Based Workload from Routinely Collected Data to Assist with Nursing Staff Planning – feasibility study Read more ADOPTED: Nurture-U (Southampton): A longitudinal survey for student metal health and wellbeing Read more ADOPTED: FLOWS Planning for Frailty: Optimal Health and Social Care Workforce Organisation Using Demand-led Simulation Modelling Read more ADOPTED: SORT-IT (Salisbury Operational Research Track – Improving Together) Read more Workforce Evaluation Toolkit project (WET) Read more ADOPTED: Social Prescribers In Deprescribing Role (SPiDeR) Read more ADOPTED: Improving patient safety, workforce wellbeing and NHS efficiency through improved shift patterns for nursing staff: study protocol Read more PARIEDA - Prediction of Acute Respiratory Infection outcomes prior to Emergency Department Attendance Read more COMPLETED ADOPTED PROJECT: Geospatial mapping of emergency calls from older adults to ambulance services in the South Central region, with a focus on people living with dementia: a feasibility study. Read more COMPLETED: Predicting Patient Deterioration Risks in COMMunities Read more ADOPTED PROJECT: Developing and testing a Patient Report Experience Measure for patients accessing Acute OnCology services: The PREMAC study Read more ADOPTED: Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of different workforce configurations in English acute hospitals: a longitudinal retrospective study using routinely collected data Read more COMPLETED POST DOCTORAL PROJECT: The career aspirations of nurses working in the research delivery workforce: a cross-sectional survey Read more ADOPTED PROJECT: Magnet4Europe: Improving mental health and wellbeing in the health care workplace Read more PROCED: PROactive, Collaborative and Efficient complex Discharge Read more Mental Health, Workforce and Well-being Research Framework - ARC Collaboration Read more COMPLETED: Safer Nursing Care Tool and nurse staffing requirements Read more COMPLETED: Shift Pattern Feasibility Read more COMPLETED: Improving community health care planning Read more COMPLETED: CLECC Toolkit and background: Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care (CLECC) Read more COMPLETED: COVID-19 Emergency Department Project Read more Mental health hub projects Work lives and Wellbeing of Mental Health Nursing Workforce Read more Development of a core outcome set for mental health nurse wellbeing: a Delphi study Read more Read our publications here Read more Publications Access our evidence brief here Read more Evidence briefs Reports, toolkits and support Find the information and tools to improve your work here Read more

d7cea2fb-fab3-4e8d-86f6-e2d2952f0404 ADOPTED: Nurture-U (Southampton): A longitudinal survey for student metal health and wellbeing Principal Investigator: Lucy Dorey Start Date: 1 July 2021 End Date: 1 July 2025 Background: Promoting good mental health within university students is a priority. Anxiety, depression and self-harm are rapidly increasing. University mental health services report demand beyond their capacity. Effective ways to prevent student mental difficulties are urgently needed. Further, university should be a positive life experience and promote students' emotional fitness and ability to thrive. Research and student feedback recommend changing university culture, environment and teaching to promote wellbeing. Stepped care in which students move through different steps based on need is also suggested to improve student wellbeing and service capacity. This starts with wellbeing promotion and prevention for all students, steps up to self-help for those with mild symptoms and to professional support for those with elevated symptoms. However, these approaches have not been rigorously tested in universities. We don't know which elements best promote good student mental health. We don't know what approaches work best for the diverse student body across gender, ethnicity, sexuality, sociodemographic background. We will test initiatives within the university environment and at each of the steps, see which initiatives students use, how well they work, and identify which work best for which students across diverse groups. Students will be active partners in shaping, delivering and evaluating all research. We will use repeated twice-yearly online surveys across 6 universities (110k undergraduates) to assess student wellbeing and mental health and understand what helps or hinders students seeking and getting help. A digital self-monitoring tool allows students to track their wellbeing, stress, and what support they use over time so we can map how they move through stepped care and how different steps interact with each other. To test whether changing university environment promotes wellbeing, first we will evaluate embedding compassion into education: teaching about diversity and mental health, practising kindness and understanding for self and others, and making assessment more flexible and responsive to students. Focus groups will explore how students experience this approach. Second, we will introduce a voluntary online mental health literacy course for first year undergraduates that teaches what influences mental health, how to promote wellbeing and how to seek help. Surveys before and after the course will test if it increases students' knowledge, healthy behaviours, helps-seeking and wellbeing. To better understand how to make self-help work for students, randomised trials will test book-based guided self-help to build personal strengths, unguided digital self-help to prevent depression in high-worrying students and digital self-help for depression and anxiety. We will compare supported versus unsupported digital cognitive-behavioural therapy, meditation and peer support apps to find out which app(s) students find most acceptable and explore which students most benefit from. We will test self-help with and without support because unsupported self-help can reach vastly more people and there is uncertainty about whether and for whom supported self-help is more effective. To improve the efficiency of student mental health services, we will test if adding a digital self-monitoring tool shared between student and clinician improves student experience and time to recovery by enabling care to be more proactive and responsive (e.g., more frequent meetings if symptoms rise). From this research, we will develop an evidence-based integrated model of inclusive and acceptable student wellbeing and mental health support. In partnership with students and university leaders, this model will inform policy recommendations. We will develop guidance, courses and tools to promote student wellbeing that are easily added to existing systems or that use tried-and-tested low-cost technology to ease their adoption and ongoing use.

bc679d13-74ba-4311-9808-713cccad3190 ADOPTED PROJECT: DIGNIFIE Gender-seNsitive evaluatIon oF a prIson alternativE DIGNIFIE: Gender-seNsitive evaluatIon oF a prIson alternativE - (intervention is known as Hope Street) Chief Investigator: Dr Emma Plugge – University of Southampton Project Team Members: Ms Donna Gipson – Empowering People: Inspiring Change, Ms Paula Harriott – Prison Reform Trust, Dr Kathy Kendall – University of Southampton, Professor Julie Parkes – University of Southampton, Dr Sara Morgan – University of Southampton Professor James Raftery – University of Southampton, Dr Lucy Wainwright Revolving Doors, Dr Naomi Gadian – University of Southampton, Dr James Hall – University of Southampton Organisations Involved One Small Thing, Prison Reform Trust, Ministry of Justice, Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services, Vivid Housing, Crown and Magistrates Courts, Southampton City Council, Adult Services, Southampton, Children Services, Southampton, Housing and Community Inclusion, Change Grow Live (CGL) Southampton, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire County Council, Portsmouth City Council, Society of St James Background: This evaluation seeks to determine whether women’s health and wellbeing, social and criminal justice outcomes are improved when they are placed in a community based residential facility (Hope Street) rather than being imprisoned. The Ministry of Justice’s 2018 Female Offender Strategy sets out plans to improve outcomes for women in the community and custody. It aspires to ensure that fewer women are imprisoned and recommends the move to community management of women in contact with the criminal justice system (CJS), including residential women’s centres with places for women to bring their children. It is in this context that Hope Street, the community alternative to imprisonment, has been developed in Southampton. Women in contact with the CJS are some of the most disadvantaged people in society. One third of them will have been in care as children, two thirds live with ongoing domestic abuse and most will have experienced poverty. They have lower basic skills attainment than the general population, are more likely to be unemployed and to be in insecure housing. Their health is considerably poorer than that of women in the community; for example, the standardised mortality ratio for suicide is 20 times higher in imprisoned women than in the general population. This mixed methods study comprises qualitative research, a prospective cohort study and health economic evaluation. It started in 2021 and will be completed in 2027.

Web-based Implementation Toolkit (WIT) Quick links: Project Outputs Buy-in and Engagement Fit with Health and Social Care Systems Alignment with Health and Social Care Priorities Outcomes and Impact Adoption and Spread Checklist, webinar and resources Quick links: Project Outputs This Web-based Implementation Toolkit (WIT) is designed to be easy to use and intended for a variety of users, projects and settings where implementation is planned or being considered. Implementation is the attempt to introduce a new intervention, innovation or policy developed through research and apply it to health and/or social care and the third sector. WIT provides you with an interactive Implementation Wheel, Checklist and bite-size Webinars (average 10 minutes) to support you through your implementation journey. Who is WIT for? WIT recognises the need to provide freely available, accessible and simple to use tools that focus on key considerations at the outset of a project. WIT was through interactive workshops with health and social care professionals, third sector organisation professionals, academics and members of the public. Anyone looking to understand more about or engage in implementation. Why use WIT? When to use WIT From the beginning – when first considering and designing a project Throughout all stages of your implementation journey and beyond To guide you through implementation considerations for your project There are six wheel domains to help you consider what is required for implementation. Click on a domain segment to find out more. Adoption and Spread Project Outputs Buy-in and Engagement Fit with Health and Social Care Systems Alignment with Health and Social Care Priorities Outcomes and Impact How to use WIT Use the interactive Implementation Wheel, Checklist and bitesize Webinars to support you on your implementation journey and beyond. The six Wheel domains can be used iteratively, and in no particular order. The Checklist is downloadable and consists of the same domains as the Wheel. You can use this to complete with your team and check progress of your implementation journey. The Webinars , approximately 10 minutes duration, provide sessions relating to the six Wheel and Checklist domains and also to an introduction to implementation and implementation theories and frameworks. Hover on keywords to see definitions Other words in bold represent key learning points The Resources section provides suggestions for other resources you may find helpful. implementation Implementation is the attempt to introduce a new intervention, innovation or policy developed through research and apply it to health and/or social care and the third sector. co-produced Co-production refers to a way of working together, often with service users, to reach a collective output. Feedback via our short survey If you fulfil the criteria on the attached poster , Researchers from the School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton/NIHR ARC Wessex would like you to test WIT by providing feedback via a short survey . Or alternatively scan the QR code. Thank you. Contact us If you have any questions about WIT, please contact: C.F.Brooks@soton.ac.uk Disclaimer The development of WIT has been supported by the NHS Insight Prioritisation Programme (NIPP). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of this website. How to cite Brooks, C.F., Lund, S., Kryl, D., and Myall M. (2023) Web-based Implementation Toolkit (WIT). University of Southampton. Available at: www.arc-wx.nihr.ac.uk/web-implementation-toolkit Accessibility We are committed to providing a website that is accessible to as many people as possible. We are actively working to increase the accessibility and usability of the website.

Healthy Ageing, Dementia and Frailty National Priority Research Programme The research is focused on the health challenges facing our growing older population. The projects are as much about staying well and supporting people as finding better ways to care for and treat people with the many multi-morbidities that can develop in later life. Read about how Pat and Julia got involved in this impressive national research programme Read: Evidence and Policy recommendations - Strengthening Community Based Falls Prevention in England Falls among older adults in the UK are a major public health concern, with approximately one- third of people aged 65 and over experiencing a fall each year. Falls can result in severe injuries and contribute to increased health and social care costs, as well as disability and premature death. Despite strong evidence for falls prevention programmes, implementation across England remains inconsistent and fragmented. Linked to FLEXI project Download the report above of flick through it in the gallery to the right Strengthening Community-Based Falls Prevention in England_Page_1 Strengthening Community-Based Falls Prevention in England_Page_2 Strengthening Community-Based Falls Prevention in England_Page_8 Strengthening Community-Based Falls Prevention in England_Page_1 1/8 Our research projects WHELD: Training care home staff to improve well-being and mental health of dementia residents led by NIHR ARC Peninsula and working with NIHR ARC South London, NIHR ARC East Midlands, NIHR ARC East of England, NIHR ARC North East North Cumbria, NIHR ARC North West Coast and NIHR ARC Yorkshire and Humber Read more FinCH Implementation study: Falls prevention in care homes led by NIHR ARC East Midlands working with NIHR ARC North East North Cumbria, NIHR ARC West Midlands and NIHR ARC South London. Read more FLEXI: Falls management exercise programme led by NIHR ARC East Midlands working with NIHR ARC Greater Manchester and NIHR ARC South West Peninsula Read more Who is participating? NIHR ARC Greater Manchester NIHR ARC Yorkshire and Humber NIHR ARC South West Peninsula NIHR ARC East Midlands NIHR ARC West Midlands NIHR ARC North East and North Cumbria NIHR ARC North West Coast NIHR ARC South London NIHR ARC East of England

ARC Wessex Early Career Researchers - Cara Black, Naomi Leonard, Olivia Taylor and Annabelle Prescott < Back Engaging Children and Young People in Research Community of Practice Inaugural Meeting ARC Wessex Early Career Researchers - Cara Black, Naomi Leonard, Olivia Taylor and Annabelle Prescott September 2023, University of York, UK There is a knowledge gap in our understanding about approaches and methods for meaningfully involving and engaging with children and young people in matters and decisions that impact on them. We went to a two-day meeting at the University of York with researchers from the University of York, Bristol, Hertfordshire, Southampton and Auckland, NZ as well as a representative from the International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders. This group came together to form an international Community of Practice (CoP), with the goal of sharing learning, methods, and experience for effective ways to engage young people. It also highlighted the wide variety of opportunities for putting children and young people at the heart of research, decision making and advocacy for their mental health and well-being. Here are our reflections as early career researchers (ECRs) from the meeting: What did we gain from the meeting? We thoroughly enjoyed being with professionals who have expertise in research for youth health, wellbeing, mental health, and youth advocacy. We gained an understanding of what exactly a community of practice is, listened to the experiences of all members and contributed to the conversations. It was lovely to hear international voices and get to exchange creative ideas for involving young people and encouraging them to share their ideas, as well as learning a great deal about youth engagement in general. What were our highlights? Hearing from the Healthy Mind Apprentices; Chloe, Kenzie, Lauren & Phoebe who are a group of young people passionate about mental health who work across Bradford and Craven to support young people, communities and schools with their health and wellbeing. They reflected on their time working with Y-MHESH and spoke about what their apprenticeship meant to them and what they have learned along the way. They shared with us that the problem is not that young people don’t have a voice; they instead believe that decision makers are not listening. Therefore, it was interesting to hear that we need to take necessary steps to ensure ‘decision makers’ are able and willing to share the decision-making power with young people. Overall being involved in the CoP was positive, as we had the opportunity to be involved in discussions with leaders in the field. Often, we can become ‘stuck’ in our ideas, so having the opportunity to present new ideas and challenge our Community of Practice to think in novel ways which align with the realities for children and young people was a highlight for sure. What could have been improved? It might have been more beneficial for our CoP group if the Healthy Mind Apprentices joined us for longer, as these fabulous young people reminded us that it is about listening and valuing meaningful involvement of children and young people, so it would have been great to have more youth representation in our own decision-making processes. Youth voices should be included throughout our CoP meetings, whether this be the Healthy Mind apprentices or groups of different young people. One of the main challenges in this area is that when coproduction and research is done with young people, they often don’t see the outputs they have created or get to feel the impact of their work before they move. It’s important we consider this when setting out to do co-production work or research with children and young people. What are the advantages of involving early career researchers in research and in the CoP? We provide a fresh perspective on topical issues today and have greater freedom to think beyond our specialty areas. This gives us the ability to consider the broader picture at an international or societal level and bridge the gap between young people and established researchers, as we understand the points of view and needs of young people, while simultaneously understanding research processes. This meeting was a great way to solidify the learning from the CoP and focus us on a clear path forward to best support the goals of children and young people in research. Reflections Reflections on public engagement and engagement in research for young people From the perspective of an ECR, it seems extremely important that “brand image” and visibility are recognised by senior management at universities and funders at research centers. Engaging well with the public, in this case, young people, both heightens visibility and reinforces brand image, which is why Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) work with young people within schools, young people’s PPI groups and other youth groups, including the Healthy Mind Apprenticeship scheme, is so valuable. Although, it can be difficult to get PPIE work funded. The purpose of PPIE work is to get people’s views on what needs to be researched and what is important to them, so to do this after a project has been decided defeats the purpose. Young people form part of our communities, but their inputs have been historically overlooked as unimportant or uninformed. Yet, some of the most valuable insights come from our young people, because at the end of the day this is their reality, and they live it every day. It is therefore crucial to have young people be meaningfully engaged so research, funding and decisions are aligned with what people want and need – and children and young people should be no exception. If we consider and give power to the voices of young people, then perhaps we can work to meaningfully elevate the health and wellbeing of entire future communities. So with that, we leave you with this whakatauki (Māori proverb). Mā whero, mā pango ka oti ai te mahi With red and black the work will be complete Previous Next

b0d87773-4d77-4612-90fe-50bd8c01a4e7 COMPLETED: Development of policy recommendations to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on physical activity and mental health in individuals with multimorbidity: a mixed method study. Principle Investigator – Professor Mari-Carmen Portillo (University of Southampton) Team: Dr Danielle Lambrick (University of Southampton) Dr James Faulkner (University of Winchester) Dr Leire Ambrosio Gutierrez (University of Southampton) Associate Professor Beth Stuart (University of Southampton), Professor Suzanne McDonough (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland) Professor Melitta McNarry (Swansea University) Dr Jacqui Morris (University of Dundee) Dr James Steele (Solent University) Mr Eric Compton (PPI Representative) Ms Katherine Baker (University Hospital Southampton) Mr Jack Shakespeare (UK Active) Dr Matthew Wade (UK Active) Start: January 2021 End: June 2022 Aim of the research: To understand the impact of COVID-19 and government restrictions on physical activity and mental health of people with long-term conditions, and propose recommendations to support and sustain their physical activity during and after COVID-19 or other pandemics. The findings of our study will inform stakeholder events across the UK including participants and policy-makers to draw action plans together. Background to the research: People, including those with long-term conditions, were told to use physical distancing, self-isolation and/or shielding during COVID-19 to protect themselves and others. Government guidance on physical activity may or may not have explained to people how to be physically active and take part in exercise during COVID-19. Physical activity has a positive effect on physical and mental health, so understanding the impact of COVID-19 on physical activity behaviours (amount, type and intensity of physical activity, resources) of people with or without long-term conditions is important. What did we find out? General physical activity (PA) guidelines are not suitable for people with long term conditions (LTCs). Existing generic PA guidelines by the World Health Organization are not suitable for everyone because differences in age, gender, physical abilities, PA preferences, and LTC severity may affect why people choose not to exercise Online resources are not accessible for all populations. During COVID-19 pandemic, provision of PA information was most commonly available online. Hence, PA programmes designed for the general population may not be appropriate for clinical groups from a safety perspective People living with one LTC engaged in more moderate and high intensity PA compared to those with multiple LTCs People living with one LTC present better overall quality of life and lower anxiety and depression than those living with multiple LTCs Physical activity guidelines should be specific. Local and national government guidelines were identified as unclear for those living with LTCs and should be more specific regarding what people who were shielding could and could not do What difference could this make? Developing health and social care strategies to sustain PA, optimise online/offline resources and communication to promote individuals with LTCs can remain physically active Helping policy and guidelines development, particularly for those living with multiple LTCs Why is this important? Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on physical activity and mental health is beneficial to informing LTC policy development, to better support people living with LTCs to be physically active during future periods of mobility restriction and/or pandemics Findings emerged in this project, will support The development of more tailored and person-centred physical activity (PA) guidelines. in the case of individuals who are advised to shield, guidance should be provided on how they can be physically active within and around their homes. For example, tailor their PA according to how they manage and cope with their LTC and its changeability is recommended Prioritising vulnerable groups is recommended. Therefore, people with LTCs are an important and specific group to consider when designing and delivering PA guidelines during shielding or social-distancing periods How we are sharing our findings Policy recommendations have been developed that capture strategies to sustain Physical Activity and optimise online/offline resources and communication to promote individuals with Long Term Conditions can remain physically active. Policy Brief .pdf Download PDF • 3.53MB Findings from the quantitative and qualitative phase of the project informed stakeholder engagement activities across all counties of the UK. Representatives from macro, meso and micro levels were approached as well as Patients and Public contributors. Publication: Full article: Accessibility and applicability of physical activity guidelines and recommendations for adults living with long term conditions during COVID-19 (tandfonline.com) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285785 Conference: Presented mixed methods results of the project in an international congress - 7th World conference on qualitative research (25-27 January 2023) Development of recommendations co-developed at event January 2023 Podcast planned for 2023

a8af900b-b089-4b7b-8da9-b042b753eab0 The feasibility of community pharmacies testing for Hepatitis C in people who inject image and performance enhancing drugs Principal Investigators: Dr Ryan Buchanan Team members: Dr Ryan Buchanan (Academic Clinical Lecturer Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton), Professor Salim Khakoo (Professor of Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton), Dr Charlotte Cook (Hepatology Research Fellow, University Hospital Southampton), Dr Mark Wright (University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust), Charlotte Matthews (Southampton City Council), Dr Gemma Ward (Public Health England) , Colin McAllister (Southampton City CCG), Stuart Smith ( Hepatitis C Trust ), Mark Wright (NHS England, Wessex Operational Delivery Network for Hepatitis C ), Pamela Campbell (Solent NHS Trust, Homeless Healthcare Team) Start: 1 December 2019 Ends: 1 January 2024 Project Partners : University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Solent NHS Trust, NHS England, Public Health England, Southampton City CCG, Southampton City Council, Hepatitis C Trust. Lay summary: The people at highest risk of Hepatitis C (HCV) in the United Kingdom (UK) are those who are sharing needles, syringes or injecting equipment. This includes people who inject performance and image enhancing drugs (PIEDs) such as steroids.This population are high users of needle and syringe programmes, however, the risks taken by this population and their access to testing for HCV are poorly understood. The information that is available is not consistent, with the proportion of people with HCV varying widely but may be as high as one in seven PIED users. The study has been discussed in detail with bodybuilders, a gym owner, pharmacists and people who work at needle and syringe programmes (NSPs). The bodybuilders were very keen to be involved in the study as they want to have accurate, scientifically performed studies. They feel strongly that the information that is out there currently is not representative of their community that use PIEDs. They also felt that it was important that to have a focus on HCV but they were keen to be involved in a study that also addresses at other elements of liver health. The methodology for the study were discussed and adapted after patient and public involvement (PPI) meetings.The aim of this study is to see if widening access to testing of HCV based in community pharmacies with a pathway into specialist care is able to provide improved and acceptable access to testing and treatment compared with standard care. We also want to gain a better understanding of the burden of HCV in this group of people who are using PIEDs, and an understanding of risk behaviours. We will also investigate knowledge of liver disease caused by other factors (e.g. alcohol and obesity). This will be done via interviews with bodybuilders to understand more about their behaviour and the risks they take. This will be followed by a survey with an associated HCV test and measurement of liver scarring. The information gained from the interviews, surveys and tests will give a far greater understanding of this population and their risk of HCV. This information can then be used to target at-risk groups and to adapt current approaches with the aim of elimination. The results will be disseminated in medical journals and presented at medical conferences. Publications doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13207 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13554 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riac064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-BASL.130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-BASL.40 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13786 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(20)32040-7

7fc9e212-9328-4765-add4-7315e187c43b Workforce Evaluation Toolkit project (WET) Outline: This is a commissioned piece of work from the ARC Wessex Workforce & Health Systems (WHS) theme to support them with regular requests from healthcare providers. The project is to iteratively develop a generic toolkit for the evaluation of new workforce roles across healthcare. The aim during the current project is to build a first trial version to prove the toolkit concept and generate buy-in from system partners. The Bakker’s Workforce engagement model Burnout forms the conceptual basis for evaluation toolkit. The deliverable for this project is a minimal viable product, in the shape of a workforce evaluation toolkit. Team: Ruth Barker Programme Manager – Insight Health Innovation Wessex . Cheryl Davies, Senior Programme Manager Innovation Adoption, Health Innovation Wessex. Rachel Bailey Senior Programme Manager - Insight, Health Innovation Wessex. Ends: 30 June 2024 More detailed outline or project and partners Workforce Evaluation Project Work Packages 011223[99] .docx Download DOCX • 390KB

0be5d40d-fcbc-4b27-971a-75e1967ce33d COMPLETED: Development of a core outcome set for nurse wellbeing: a Delphi study Lead applicant: Dr Gemma Simons Co-applicants: Prof Jane Ball , Prof David Baldwin , Dr Emma Wadey, Dr Catherine Smith Participant Information Sheet : Download here Project Summary: Read project summary document (short summary) Read project summary document (long summary) Background : Little attention has been paid to the work lives and wellbeing of the nursing workforce, despite it being a priority area. Currently, there is no consensus on what wellbeing is or how it should be measured. An evidence-based, positive way of measuring wellbeing is through a Core Outcome Set. What is a Core Outcome Set? Outcomes are used to measure whether a strategy, intervention or action has had the required result. There are often multiple outcomes and ways of measuring them, which makes comparison difficult. A Core Outcome Set is an agreed, or consensus, set of outcomes and measurement tools that, when used, provide consistent and comprehensive focus as everyone is measuring and reporting the same outcomes in the same way. Aim: This project aims to develop a Core Outcome Set for Nurse Wellbeing. Objectives: Produce a list of potential wellbeing outcomes and help text to describe them in that are clear and meaningful for nurses [PPI panel] Develop a consensus between nurses and nurse wellbeing experts on a core outcome set for nurse wellbeing [Delphi Study] Identify and assess for quality measurement instruments for the core outcome set for nurse wellbeing identified by the Delphi study [Critical Literature Review] Select measurement tools for the identified core outcome set and agree on a final Core Outcome Set for Nurse Wellbeing [PPI panel and Study Advisory Group]. Implications and Impact: A Core Outcome Set for Nurse Wellbeing developed by nursing and nurse wellbeing experts will provide researchers and those undertaking governance with evidence-based and meaningful tools with which to evaluate wellbeing interventions. This study is registered on the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET Initiative) database https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2433 Publiations The Mental Health of Medical Students: Supporting Wellbeing in Medical Education | Oxford Academic ( oup.com ) https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21177

de23ed25-467a-496e-b29a-68a949839608 ADOPTED: FLOWS Planning for Frailty: Optimal Health and Social Care Workforce Organisation Using Demand-led Simulation Modelling Principal Investigator: Dr Bronagh Walsh, Associate Professor, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton. Team: Professor Peter Griffiths , School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton: Dr Carole Fogg, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton: Mr Mike Hepburn, Southampton Business School, University of Southampton: Dr Abigail Barkham, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust: Honorary Professor Martin Vernon, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust: Professor Lee-Ann Fenge, Department of Social Work and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University: Professor Jane Ball, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton: Professor Sally Brailsford, Southampton Business School, University of Southampton: Ms Francesca Lambert, PPI lead, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton. Start: 01/11/2022 End: 31/10/2025 Background: As the population ages, robust workforce planning to meet future demands for health and social care by older people is needed. A lack of evidence in this area has led to a mis-match between the health and social care demand from the ageing population and the current workforce capacity. The proposed study will use demand-led simulation modelling of the workforce required to address the specific challenge of providing health and social care for the growing numbers of older people living with frailty. Aims & Objectives: The aim of the study is to use simulation modelling to explore long-term trends in frailty-related health and social care use in the ageing population and its implications for future workforce size and competencies to support high quality care. The primary objective of this study is the creation of a simulation model that will inform service and workforce planning to meet health and social care needs associated with frailty. Methods: The study will use a System Dynamics design to develop and test the simulation model. Work packages comprise a scoping review, gathering of public and professional perspectives on service provision via a survey and stakeholder engagement activities, and analysis of linked health and social care data, all of which inform the simulation modelling work package and development of a workforce planning toolkit. Timelines for delivery: The scoping review will be completed in year 1. Routine health and social care data specification and extraction will occur in year 1, as will service mapping and classification and survey preparation. Survey data collection and analysis will occur in year 2. Simulation modelling will commence in year 2, with validation, sensitivity analyses and scenario modelling in year 3. Development of workforce guidelines and toolkit will occur in. year 3 Stakeholder engagement, including patient public involvement, will run throughout the study, reviewing study results and informing development of the other work packages. Anticipated impact & dissemination: This study will provide new, direct evidence about the impact of frailty on health and social care workforce requirements within the ageing population The improved understanding of workforce requirements offered by this study will inform workforce planning for frailty services across health and social care, ensuring future benefit for patients through provision of timely and appropriate care and a workforce planning toolkit to support local decision-making.

Public and Community Involvement, Engagement and Particpation Getting Involved Why Do People Get Involved? We believe that everyone has something worthwhile to contribute and we are all working together to ensure that the voices of local people are at the heart of all we do. Here are some reasons our public members gave for getting involved: John is working with the research team on neurological conditions "Just knowing I can make a difference and be part of the solution is really beneficial to my mental and physical wellbeing" Read about why Pat and Julia got involved in a national research programme Who Can Get Involved? Anyone with knowledge and, or experience of Health or Social Care services in our Wessex region, which covers Hampshire, Isle of Wight, Dorset and South Wiltshire. Your experiences and views to help us shape our research to improve the Health and Social Care services offered. How Can You Get Involved? We have a number of opportunities for public members to be involved in the work of the ARC, these are: Public Contributor: Being a Public Contributor you will become part of our research family and can be involved in some of our locally based research projects. We will let you know when opportunities to be involved become available via email. There is no minimum or maximum commitment, you can pick and choose the involvement opportunities as they are offered, depending on your interests and availability. Or Public Advisor: We have a team of public members who have taken on additional roles as Public Advisors. As well as being involved in the same way as the Public Contributors, Public Advisors work with our research theme teams and support the organisational work (governance) of ARC Wessex, helping to ensure the research we support is relevant to our local communities and meets our objectives (aims/ goals). Questions? - jump to our guide section ARC Public Involvement Forum The ARC Public Involvement Forum - or APIF for short, links researchers with public contributors for each other of our research time areas. The areas are: Ageing & dementia, Healthy communities, Long-term conditions, Health systems and Workforce, as well as our Mental health and Social care research hubs. Each public contributor or Public Research Champion is part of research theme meetings and is supported by a Staff Link who is normally a member of the research team for that theme. Sign up? Signing up is a simple process which allows us to get to know you a little better. For more information or an informal discussion please click here to email the team at publicinvolvement@uhs.nhs.uk . Alternatively, you can write to the Team at: ARC Wessex, Public Involvement, Southampton Science Park, Innovation Centre, 2 Venture Road, Chilworth, Southampton SO16 7NP or please contact us by calling 023 8120 4989 Who's in the ARC Public Involvement Team Ageing & Dementia Sarah Fearn – Staff Link Sarah Fearne My name is Sarah Fearn, and I am a Senior Research Fellow and Staff Link for PPIE in the Ageing and Dementia theme in the ARC. I have been passionate about PPIE since I first became a health researcher. I have always valued the unique view and wisdom that people with lived experience of the condition can bring to the research project. As I have gained more experience of PPIE, I have developed my knowledge and experience about different approaches to PPIE and how we can best involve public contributors in everything we do. Pam Holloway – Research Champion Ageing & dementia My name is Pam Holloway and I have been involved in many and varied research projects over a number of years. You get to work with amazing people, and you are always appreciated for your contributions. You will get plenty of support and I thoroughly recommend this to anyone. Long Term Conditions Carolyn Fitton – Staff Link I am Carolyn Fitton, and I am the staff representative for PPIE for the Long-term conditions theme. As a Physiotherapist by background, I transitioned to a career in research back in 2002. I have always passionately believed that the person with a condition is the 'expert' in their condition. Therefore, engaging with PPIE has been a lead role for me in each research study I have been involved in. As a member of the APIF team I can play my part to ensure that the research we undertake is relevant and impactful for the people with the condition and their carers. Jean Hughes – Research Champion Long-term conditions My name is Jean Hughes, I’ve been involved in PPIE with the ARC since early 2020. I’m one of two core contributor’s working in Long Term Conditions theme. In a project I was involved in, within this theme, it enabled me to help shape research and it’s outcomes. Sally Dace - Research Champion Long-term conditions My name is Sally Dace. I have personal experience of negotiating the health care system with multiple long-term conditions, both as a patient and as a carer. As a frequent user of healthcare, I want to give something back by using my experiences to contribute to health research. My aim is to contribute to improving systems and care for patients, and for the people who work in healthcare. I am passionate about PPIE and feel that public contributors have a valuable perspective to bring to the table and should be equal partners with researchers and health care professionals. There is nothing more rewarding than seeing a project you have worked on translated into practice. Healthy Communities Donna Clutterbuck – Staff Link I’m Donna Clutterbuck and I’m the staff link for the Healthy Communities theme and a research fellow based at the University of Southampton. I became involved in PPIE work through previous research projects, which has led to a greater interest in how we can involve public contributors and communities in coproducing research that helps to reduce health inequalities. Richard Mandunya - Research Champion Healthy Communities Richard is a passionate member of the Public Participation and Involvement network. He has a special interest in diversity and equality, with experience in both physical and mental health research. His health involvement work has included regional, national, and international organisations and patient alliances Fran Richards - Research Champion Healthy Communities My name is Fran Richards, and I work as a Learning Technologist by day. In my free time, I am passionate about contributing to medical research. My journey into Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) began when I responded to a poster in a maternity ward inviting participants for a clinical trial. Since then, I’ve been actively involved in designing and participating in numerous trials. My daughter and I have been part of one ongoing trial for over six years, and I am proud to have progressed to becoming a co-applicant on another. I genuinely enjoy helping to shape the future of research by bringing a layperson’s perspective to the process. Workforce & Health Systems Chiara Dall’Ora – Staff Link My name is Chiara Dall'Ora and I am an associate professor of health workforce and deputy team lead in the Workforce and Health Systems theme. I became involved in PPIE as a junior researcher by supporting a priority setting exercise to establish research priorities for patients, and since then I have been constantly working with patients and the public throughout all of our research projects. I am also the PPIE staff link for the Workforce and Health Systems theme which means I work with our PPIE champion to make sure PPIE is at the heart of everything that we do in our theme. Ian Dickerson – Research Champion Workforce & Health Systems I got involved many years ago when I responded to a newspaper advert asking if people were interested in taking fish oil as part of a medical trial. Over the years I’ve done a bit of everything from edit patient information sheets, be a trial participant, sit on trial management groups, be a co-signatory on funding applications and even sit on interview panels. Why do it? It’s interesting, you get to meet a lot of great people and you might well end up being part of something that will change lives. Social Care - Andy Pulman - Staff Link Helen Sloan - Mental Health/Social Care Research Champion I am public contributor for the Mental Health Hub and Social Care Capacity Building Group in ARC Wessex and contribute as a member of the public in various parts of NIHR, health trusts and organisations. As a person with various diagnoses myself and who has been a carer for family members over the years, I try to be an ambassador for the impact and positive change that health and social care research can bring. I am also trained as an independent advocate for vulnerable adults and in a former life was an art curator of digital and interdisciplinary art and science projects. Mental Health Skaiste Linceviciute - Staff Link I engage in Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) activities for two essential reasons. First, to ensure our research meaningfully addresses community needs and is guided by people with lived expertise—individuals who navigate daily the very conditions and issues we study. Second, PPIE represents the moment research truly comes alive. These interactions show how research can impact people’s lives and highlight areas that need refinement. I find these conversations truly inspiring and it provides valuable learning opportunities that I always look forward to. Main Page Researcher Resources Strategy Questions? It's natural to have questions so we have put together some of the answers to commonly asked questions about public involvement and engagement with research - take a look below and see if these answers help. How would I be involved? Opportunities to help shape our research are varied and will depend on your interests. Activities include: Completing surveys or voting in online polls (this can be done remotely/at home) Attend group meetings and share your ideas and opinions, or help write and comment on information sheets for participants Work directly with our researchers and advise them on how to talk or write about their research findings in a way that is easy to understand How much time will it take? We understand people have different amounts of free time they’re able to give to PPI so we are very flexible in terms of how often you get involved. We will invite you to contribute to projects that match your interests – some may be one-off activities that could take an hour whilst others will require more commitment, such as attending group meetings every couple of months. However, you can decide which opportunities fit your schedule. What’s in it for me? There are many reasons why people choose to get involved with our PPI activities. You may want to share your health experiences, or give back to the NHS to help improve the lives of others. Or, you may want to develop your own skills or are just passionate about healthcare issues. People who are considering a career in healthcare find interacting with researchers and staff particularly useful. How are young people involved? We have a PPI group for young people aged 8-18 and another for young adults aged 16-24 . We meet regularly with both groups to get their ideas and opinions on research projects directly aimed at young people. Will I get paid? We are grateful for the time and effort our PPI members give and are able to reimburse costs of taking part in our PPI activities – for example, travel and carer or childcare costs. How do I find out more? The PPI team can provide more information, including how to become a PPI member, and answer any questions you have. You can contact the team by calling 023 8120 4989 or emailing PublicInvolvement@uhs.nhs.uk You can also join our mailing list (if you’re aged 16 years and over) to receive updates on our PPI activities and opportunities to get involved. If your child is interested in joining one of the PPI groups for young people, contact us to find out more. Anchor 1 Anchor 2